tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25254614.post454944537514891183..comments2024-03-23T23:46:29.024-07:00Comments on The Fabuleous Fifties: Ger Apeldoornhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03633862833036214748noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25254614.post-43902785050367221472008-11-02T09:57:00.000-08:002008-11-02T09:57:00.000-08:00BTW, as an "inside" reference, the Emery Hawkins c...BTW, as an "inside" reference, the Emery Hawkins character come across in the desert is in fact a real person who would make anyone's short list of all-time top animators, known best for his work at Warner Bros.p spectorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02937340957485668849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25254614.post-6899109437571570352008-11-02T09:48:00.000-08:002008-11-02T09:48:00.000-08:00Actually there weren't too many versions of this s...Actually there weren't too many versions of this strip: one in pencil, and then when inked the changes were made, not just cleaned up but the how the characters appeared as well. They never started out as the cloned Coogy and Mo, only reminiscent of them.<BR/><BR/>Regarding the storyboard, which can been seen in two parts <A HREF="http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/index.php?s=galaxia&submit=Search" REL="nofollow"> HERE</A>, this would actually be a very accurate representation of his "real style", as it relates to how many animated cartoon looked in the late 1950s through a lot of the 60s. As I explained in my email to you, comic strips are really an entirely different animal from the animation process. For any storyboard, this is in fact not sketchy and simple at all. Not all that many boards would be rendered as finished or completely, let alone with dashes of color here and there.p spectorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02937340957485668849noreply@blogger.com