Just checked out Sherwood's Wikipedia page to see whether it identified any of Sherwood's ghosts. Not only didn't it, but it's a prime example of the kind of BS page that gives Wikipedia something of a bad rep. The article is pure, unabashed hagiography. Which is to say accuracy challenged. Then again, a perfect epilogue to the Goodwin/Williamson story.
Just checked out Sherwood's Wikipedia page to see whether it identified any of Sherwood's ghosts.
ReplyDeleteNot only didn't it, but it's a prime example of the kind of BS page that gives Wikipedia something of a bad rep. The article is pure, unabashed hagiography. Which is to say accuracy challenged.
Then again, a perfect epilogue to the Goodwin/Williamson story.
I might try an rewrite that. I used to have a 'handler' who accepted my blog as a source, but no longer.
ReplyDelete